peptidemeta --rank evidence

The peptide meta, ranked by receipts — not hype.

Tiers measure the strength of published evidence — from approved drug down to lab bench — never how well something works or whether it’s safe for you. How tiers work →

entries
56 47 ranked · 9 combos
cited studies
69 each checked against PubMed
approved
8 FDA or EMA · Tier S

Evidence tier list

  1. Tier S: Approved

    Approved by the FDA or EMA for at least one indication.

    8 entries
  2. Tier A: Controlled human trials

    At least one published randomized controlled trial in humans.

    17 entries
  3. Tier B: Small human studies

    Human data limited to small, open-label or pharmacokinetic studies.

    7 entries
  4. Tier C: Animal data

    Evidence comes mostly from animal studies.

    15 entries
  5. Tier D: Lab / anecdote

    Cell studies only, or almost nothing published.

    0 entries

    -- nothing at this tier yet

  6. Combos — not ranked

    Blends have no published studies of their own, so evidence for each part doesn’t transfer to the mix. Open one to see its components’ tiers.

    9 combos

Tab through peptides for a preview · Esc closes it · Informational only, not medical advice.

Reading the board

A tier is a receipt count, not a review score.

  1. Evidence, not effect. An S-tier entry isn’t “better” — it has cleared the highest bar of published evidence: regulatory approval.
  2. Every rung needs a study. Moving up the ladder takes more rigorous human data, not louder forum posts.
  3. Tiers move with the literature. When new research lands, the change shows up in the patch notes.
Read the methodology
evidence ladderexample: tier A
  1. D In vitro
  2. C Animal
  3. B Human pilot
  4. A RCT
  5. S Approved

TIER A — At least one published randomized controlled trial in humans.

entries per tiern=47
  1. Tier S: Approved 8
  2. Tier A: Controlled human trials 17
  3. Tier B: Small human studies 7
  4. Tier C: Animal data 15
  5. Tier D: Lab / anecdote 0

More of the library

Latest patch notes

Season 1: launch

peptidemeta goes live: a public library of peptides ranked by the strength of their published evidence, with every tier backed by linked sources. No dosing, no sourcing, no hype.

  • Added Every peptide in the library, each with an evidence tier, a written rationale, regulatory status and source links.
  • Revised Every cited study is checked against PubMed; citations whose record does not match are hidden until corrected.
  • Added Popular combos, listed with their components but deliberately left unranked: blends have no published studies of their own.
Read all patch notes · 6 more changes
esc
↑↓ navigate ↵ open