No. 041 · Longevity & Immune · Immune Peptide

LL-37

Also known as: Cathelicidin LL-37CAMP (cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide)

A Tier A · Controlled human trials how tiers work →
  • Not FDA approved
  • WADA ✗ S0
Compare Cite
Fingerprint 37 residues
LL-37 sequence fingerprint
  • Nonpolar 16
  • Polar 5
  • Positive charge 11
  • Negative charge 5

Each dot is a residue placed around the ring from N- to C-terminus; its distance from the centre reflects its chemistry.

01

Evidence

  1. D In vitro
  2. C Animal
  3. B Human pilot
  4. A RCT
  5. S Approved

TIER A — At least one published randomized controlled trial in humans.

Randomized placebo-controlled trials of topical LL-37 for venous leg ulcers (2014 phase 1/2; 2021 multicentre phase 2b) and diabetic foot ulcers (2023). Not approved anywhere.

Tiers rate the strength of published evidence — not effectiveness, safety, or a recommendation.

02

At a glance

Residues
37 amino acids, N→C
Molecular weight
4,493 Da
Formula
C205H340N60O53
Routes studied
Subcutaneous, Intramuscular Routes used in published research
FDA
Not approved
WADA
Prohibited · S0 Non-approved substances
03

Sequence

N → C · 37 residues · hover, tap, or use arrow keys to inspect

Note Residues 134–170 of the human cathelicidin precursor hCAP18 (UniProt P49913).

04

Overview

The only human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide, LL-37 plays a key role in innate immunity by disrupting microbial membranes and modulating inflammatory signaling.

Research status Extensive basic science research; randomized placebo-controlled trials of topical LL-37 for venous leg ulcers (2014, 2021) and diabetic foot ulcers (2023); no approved product

05

Mechanism

LL-37 is a 37-amino-acid amphipathic alpha-helical peptide that disrupts microbial membranes through electrostatic interaction with negatively charged lipid bilayers. Beyond direct antimicrobial killing, it acts as an immune alarmin by binding formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) to recruit neutrophils, monocytes, and T-cells, and it disrupts bacterial biofilms.

06

Effects reported in research

Reported outcomes, not promises. Some come from controlled human trials; others may be from smaller or preclinical studies — check the studies below.

  • Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity
  • Biofilm disruption on mucosal surfaces
  • Immune cell chemotaxis and activation
  • Wound healing acceleration
07

Safety & unknowns

Endogenous human peptide with well-established innate immune biology. Injection of exogenous LL-37 carries risk of excessive inflammation at high doses. Potential for mast cell activation. Limited formal clinical trial data for therapeutic injection. Not FDA-approved.

Unknowns. Trial safety data apply to the populations, formulations and conditions studied.

Informational only — not medical advice. peptidemeta publishes no dosing, protocols, or sourcing. Talk to a qualified clinician about any treatment decision.

08

Studies [2]

  1. Clinical trial 2014

    Treatment with LL-37 is safe and effective in enhancing healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

    Randomized placebo-controlled trial of topical LL-37 in patients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers, assessing safety and ulcer healing.

  2. Review 2012

    A comprehensive summary of LL-37, the factotum human cathelicidin peptide

    Review of LL-37 covering its antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity, chemotactic and immunomodulatory effects, and roles in wound healing.

10

Status sources

Sources behind the tier, regulatory status, sequence and dates on this page.

11

Cite this entry

$ cite --format=apa

peptidemeta. (2026). LL-37. In peptidemeta: The peptide library, ranked by evidence. Retrieved November 8, 2026, from https://peptidemeta.com/p/ll-37/

$ cite --format=bibtex
@misc{peptidemeta-ll-37,
  title = {LL-37},
  author = {{peptidemeta}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://peptidemeta.com/p/ll-37/}},
  note = {Accessed 2026-11-08}
}

Accessed date reflects when you opened this page. Cite primary studies for scientific claims.

esc
↑↓ navigate ↵ open